John Hyland
For reasons I can’t quite recall, I found myself, some time in the last year, rereading Aristotle’s Poetics. And as I began to make my way through the strained logic of those pages, I came across a strange line. It struck me—and still does—as absurd. Occurring in the sixth chapter titled “A Description of Tragedy”—but the tragedy here seems more than simply descriptive—it reads: “song is a term whose sense is obvious to everyone.” Something inherently hierarchical informs such flippancy; something deeply problematic and unexamined resides here.
Without falling into a rehearsal of the assertive categorizing that is the Poetics, I’d like to point out the context for this seemingly insignificant line: Before stating what “is obvious,” Aristotle declares “song and diction” as the “medium of representation.” Diction here is “the arrangement of verses,” and song is “a term …” etc. The equation here is obvious if not worn—but also irritatingly often the case.
All of this is to say, the notion of song informs much of my work lately. (In another project, titled Song Notions, I am trying to write what occurs in a lyrical space haunted by and tangent to song.) I’m interested in the ways that “song” functions as a poetic principle. “This is Not a Song” seeks to eschew such Aristotelian logic for “arranging verses” while still developing a lyric-informed space. As I wrote a few years ago in a series of meditations: “This is not a song. This is me singing, though. Liquid notes/intrude the air around me.” And it is this possibility of singing without song that at times holds but more often eludes my attention.
Often disembodied, “This is Not a Song” is preoccupied with sound as both an organizing principle and a signifying element. Recently I have been reading the work of Edward Kamau Brathwaite, and in his 1979 talk History of Voice he says that then recent Caribbean poetry is “based as much on sound as it is on song”: This accurately describes one of the primary concerns of this sequence. I’m interested in sound relations that move not beyond per se but away from questions of prosody; the internal sonic, not to mention semantic, resonances of a given word or phrase often determine the external arrangement of these “verses.”
Several years ago, an editor I respected told me that my work was too emotively self-conscious. While I’m still not totally sure what that means, I think a similar observation could be made here, if that makes any sense. But I’m no longer convinced such an observation is a bad thing.
Of course other concerns lurk and assert themselves here, but most crucial to this sequence is the particular fact of those poets who are often, if not always, singing within me.
John Hyland
Still River, MA
21 April 2007
from This is Not a Song
(x)
What is image
or sound from
the outside
the outset—
another’s glare
or utterance—
relief of another’s
tongue, nothing
or all between
quotation …
Or only this
as I
that I
call my own
disclosed
abandoned
stratified if listless
glance. Flare
if inward
then not
also bent,
bending
beyond questions
of the seen
what trails
sun-marked or
tinged with
disruption.
(xi)
To arrive late
as if early
were to be prized
as if to be
world, unfettered
or lit,
were pure fact
of syntax
measured, waiting
—to weigh the self
against a self
perhaps another …
All here,
there
in handy basket
in buried coffer
marked as this
assumed as that
after or before
some unquantifiable
brush or rush with
(xii)
Often to forget is to recall
the overlooked and out
this second-story window:
just sky traced and tempered
with what is sought and sought
again.
Other poems
to live in, to begin—
never to finish, never to finish—
concerning sky, a kind
of lucid forgetfulness,
a returning
to what’s unwritten.
This is a poem to read
before leaving this vanquished city,
where I heave my quiet at the world.
(xiii)
Not home but desire
as in inter—
but what emerges is not a question
of the new or the now.
The broad scope postpones
the queried line, the smear.
Nothing in isolate—
it’s all impossibly
or probably likely
on the verge of here.
Morning’s historical lens
busts or mends past
boundaries of world,
visions of this
opposition lacerates
permissions of
limits still intercede,
excoriate unification.
(xiv)
—and up
into sky
to become
look like
cloud
to clamber
about
sky
grasp
a new
see
noise
image sense
wind (sure)
descend
less
a shift
in air
to be
a verb
as rain
(a rain of)
then send
word
(xv)
Nothing but what happens between
slips into prosody
I suppose, perhaps
I am a drawn point, a focusing of
while birds turn in wind
while I think to say yes or
enough with yes enough
with if this if that then yes or
no I think not, and thank you.
*
To where some possession
might return, might stay—
might exclaim crude ligature
burnished with if emptied of
stained world in edge of
mouth shut by its own delay.
